Good Question
I have wondered about this too.
Don Banks of SI.com (Snap Judgments (cont.) - Sunday January 8, 2006) asks:
"I know the Edell Shepherd non-catch was the right call by rule in the Bucs-Redskins game, but here's what always has made me scratch my head when it comes to what constitutes possession in the end zone:
How is it you can score by merely breaking the plane of the end zone, even if you fumble the ball away a millisecond later, but you can have what looks to be a catch ruled incomplete even after you've had the ball for a step and a half in the end zone?"
Don Banks of SI.com (Snap Judgments (cont.) - Sunday January 8, 2006) asks:
"I know the Edell Shepherd non-catch was the right call by rule in the Bucs-Redskins game, but here's what always has made me scratch my head when it comes to what constitutes possession in the end zone:
How is it you can score by merely breaking the plane of the end zone, even if you fumble the ball away a millisecond later, but you can have what looks to be a catch ruled incomplete even after you've had the ball for a step and a half in the end zone?"
posted by EPE | Link:1/09/2006 10:56:00 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home